Skip to content

I swear, Ociffer, it wasn’t anywhere near my ear

October 25, 2009

I love it when one of my little pet theories is vindicated.

In yesterday’s Globe and Mail there was an article on driver distraction and cellphones. Ontario is introducing legislation (already in place in most provinces) that bans hand-held cellphones in the driver’s seat, but still allows hands-free devices.

Ever since the first province announced the first piece of this kind of legislation, I’ve been spouting off to anyone who will listen that hands-free isn’t good enough. Drivers may have both hands on the wheel, but that doesn’t mean they’re paying attention to the road. The Globe cites a University of Utah professor who agrees: “Prof. Strayer has measured the eye movements, brain activity and reaction time of cellphone-happy drivers, and has found those who prefer to chat while keeping their hands on the wheel are just as distracted.”

Dissenters argue that if we’re to ban dialing-and-driving outright, we should also ban loud car stereos and conversation with passengers. But I’ve always felt that there is an important difference, though I’ve had difficulty articulating why. Again, Prof. Strayer backs me up: “Talking to someone on your phone is more dangerous than chatting with someone sitting in the passenger seat: The effort engages visual and spatial parts of the brain that would otherwise be focused on the road.”

It makes sense, if you think about it. When someone is in the seat beside you, they’re sharing your experience of the road – they can see if there’s a busy intersection up ahead, if you’re getting cut off by a jerk in a sports car, if a pedestrian steps into the lane out of nowhere. They can shut up at the appropriate time and let you as the driver react to these situations; you don’t have to explain to them why you’ve suddenly dropped your end of the dialogue. In a phone conversation, the lack of visual cues means we have to put more effort into verbal responses and space-fillers.

I think there are a few other factors at play here, too – for one thing, voices over cellphones are obviously not as clear, and more concentration is required simply to decode people’s words. Also, I think the brain tries to visualize the person that is being spoken to, their surroundings, whatever situation they happen to be describing. My brain does, anyway. None of these things come into play when you’re conversing with someone inside the car.

Why do I care, you ask? I’m not even a driver. Well, I’m not a driver for a reason. The reason is that cars scare the ever-living shit out of me. Cars with distracted people at their wheels, even more so. It’s a bit of a fixation, I’ll admit. But consider one final quote from the Globe, which informs us that cellphone users are “four times more likely than other drivers to be in an accident – about the same rate of people who drive while drunk.” Seriously. Drunk driving in our society has been placed on about the same level as torturing puppies, and offenders are regularly hauled off to jail. So why do we continue to not only tolerate but defend other behaviours that are equally as dangerous?

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. Blair permalink
    November 18, 2009 9:15 am

    Simply because as early as 3 months ago, everyone was driving and talking on their mobile phone (not literally everyone, but more than not for sure). This includes the a large majority of those supposed to be role models and law makers. This is the statute of limitations time, where afterward they can be dissolved on their own personal hypocrisy and once again be model citizens.

    Right now everyone knows the law is a good one, but most of us southern “Onteribbles” live such a “now now now” life that someone not being able to get a hold of you for any duration of time is a major issue. I last month was chastised by one of my superiors because he couldn’t call me for 20 minutes.

    I was in the subway

    I even had my blackberry on in the hopes that when I surface for that 1 minute or so I can get any calls I might have missed. When i was listening to him, I realized how sad his point of view was.

    I used to talk and drive all the time. I will admit it. Sometimes it was even out of boredom. But recently with the law in affect, and the cost of those bluetooth devices ironically raised (go figure), I am enjoying the fact that my phone is off limits when I am driving.

    Perhaps it is now because I wish people would leave me alone more as opposed to look me up.

  2. December 10, 2009 8:49 pm

    “I last month was chastised by one of my superiors because he couldn’t call me for 20 minutes.”

    *splutters* Jesus! Move to BC already. Okay, so there are people like that here too. But not as many of them.

    I gave up my cellphone a couple of years ago in favour of a landline and as far as I’m concerned, I’m keeping it that way for as long as possible.

    • Blair permalink
      December 18, 2009 2:47 pm

      The problem is with this company. It’s a high stress environment, without a proper centralized hub of information (i.e. every person has a little bit of the pie that no one else has)

Comments are moderated before they appear. Insults, personal attacks and other disrespectful comments will be deleted. Debate is welcome, but keep it civil.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: